Ace Hollywood

The movie with the most nominations on the list, besides "Pirates 2", is "High School Musical". Both Zac Efron and Vanessa Hudgens were shortlisted for the Best Actor and Actress award, which can be said to have opened a very bright and brilliant star road.

But the two hot nominations are both related to DD Films. Although "Pirate 2" is a Disney movie, Daniel has investment and starred in it, not to mention "High School Musical", which is basically the topic of this year. Highest movie ever. The achievements of the two works are justified logically, but some people are unwilling to reason.

"The nominations for the first 'Social Times Public Choice Awards' were announced a few days ago. Among the film and annual awards, "Pirates of the Caribbean 2" and "High School Musical" shined brilliantly, and basically received nominations for all awards. But many people questioned , Has the close relationship between the People's Choice Award and Daniel affected the integrity of the nomination?

The four social networks hosting the Public Choice Awards are currently invested by Daniel's Plutos Investment Company. It can be said that they have basically covered the vast majority of social network users, surpassing most of them in terms of coverage. Similar awards. However, the difference of the People's Choice Award is that it does not open channels for one-number-one-vote selection, but uses a data processing system to collect annual data on social networks to come up with a list.

According to the spokesperson of the award organizing committee, considering that during the awards season, the exposure of literary and artistic films will increase significantly, the organizing committee has proposed a list of nominations, which will be announced on January 27, one and a half months later. The final list of winners will be published in the list to ensure that the awards cover more options.

But such a mechanism has made many people worry that the organizing committee in charge of this data processing system—even though they claim to be supervised by accounting firms and personnel in charge of government departments—is still unable to avoid being considered as likely to conduct manual operations.

This worry has been exacerbated by the overwhelming success of films related to Daniel on this year's nomination list. Daniel himself withdrew from the selection. It doesn't seem to have a mitigating effect, because if Daniel himself was nominated, it would cause fewer doubts-because he does have more influence and attention than others. "

"Variety" magazine has conducted a full analysis of this newly established award, a magazine that has always been known for its neutrality and authority. It's reasonable, and I didn't deliberately ignore a fact in the end.

"Of course, we need to note that this year, "Pirate 2" and "High School Musical" are indeed the two works that have received the most attention. "X-man", "Superman Returns", "Cars" and other blockbusters are all inferior. Therefore If it weren't for the award dominated by Daniel, people probably wouldn't disagree too much with the result.

Therefore, if we evaluate this nomination list from a more fair perspective, it should be said that it is an objective list. On the one hand, it has the characteristics of selection awards and represents the tastes and tendencies of Internet users. In spite of the blindness and superficiality of some selected awards, Helen Mirren's nomination is surprising and surprising.

Overall, the Public's Choice Award and its ingenious mechanics. It may take more time to prove itself. "

Compared with the moderate view of "Variety Show", Fox Cable Network is quite rude and unreasonable.

"Daniel Sandler promoted the establishment of the 'Social Times Public Choice Awards'. At the beginning of its establishment, it attracted many doubts. One of them is that the existing popularity awards,

There are Internet selection channels, so is it necessary for social networks to personally participate in creating a new choice award? The second point is that, as the person who dominates the awards, Daniel is also a participant and investor in many films, which makes the public It is generally doubted that the awards can maintain fairness; the third point is the data management system claimed by the award organizing committee. Effectiveness has not been sufficiently convincingly demonstrated.

Yesterday, the organizing committee announced the list of nominees for the first public choice award, including a series of works related to Daniel. "Pirates of the Caribbean 2", "High School Musical" and "Move Forward" were all shortlisted. This fueled skepticism about the publicity of the awards.

Perhaps, Daniel Sandler and the award organizing committee should carefully consider how to alleviate all kinds of doubts about it, otherwise the "Public Choice Award in the Social Age" will probably become a joke. "

...

As an award for the public, it is impossible for the organizing committee to pay attention to social concerns and public opinion like Daniel. Keep cold to handle.

Soon, the organizing committee issued a statement, saying that all nominations are based on facts, and I believe that all social network users have feelings. The nominated actors' exposure, influence, positive evaluation, social activity and other factors are the factors that make up the nominations. The basis of the list is based on the personal participation of website users. Therefore, the organizing committee believes that the list can represent social network users, that is, the public choice in the social age. Moreover, the organizing committee has also noticed that ordinary users have no obvious doubts or opposition to the nomination list, and support and recognition occupy the mainstream opinions. The organizing committee is deeply puzzled by the awards that some media intend to express, but hopes that All walks of life can accommodate a newly born award. Finally, they did not forget to thank everyone for their support and promise to continue to improve.

It has to be said that it is a truth to travel all over the world with reason.

The organizing committee quickly grasped the key to solving the problem.

That is, the list does represent mainstream opinions. Although many of them have a lot to do with Daniel, it is undeniable that they are indeed representative—and, for the first public choice award, the weight of each factor is still based on The basic materials such as exposure, mention rate, and activity are dominant. Perhaps with the improvement of the credibility and influence of the award, the weight of factors such as professional evaluation, movie ratings, and box office figures will gradually increase to increase the professionalism of the award—this is also a long-term plan of the organizing committee.

The public may like to vote, but what matters more is professional and authoritative awards-such as Oscars, trade union awards, and Golden Globes. The Public's Choice Award hopes to establish itself as an authoritative award in both judging and professional categories, but it needs to go step by step.

...

As a nascent award, the influence of the Public Choice Award cannot be considered small, but there is no way to compare it with the Oscars, so it was quickly overshadowed by discussions about the Oscars. The list of Oscar nominations is still relatively far away, so guessing the list has become a job that everyone enjoys.

For the People's Choice Awards, while breathing a sigh of relief, it is inevitable to feel a little bit disappointed-in Hollywood, any award will feel lost in front of the Oscars. (To be continued.)